Legal Opinion
McDougal v. County of Imperial
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1991No. 90-55774PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a long-standing dispute over rights to use property and the right to regulate its use.
Donald C. McDougal, Joyce R. McDou-gal, and Donald C. McDougal, Jr. have sued the County of Imperial for civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1985(3) and for inverse condemnation. The district court dismissed their complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), holding that the § 1983 and § 1985(3) claims were barred by a one-year statute of limitations and that the McDougals failed to state a claim for inverse condemnation because the County’s regulatory purpose…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Woods v. Illinois Department of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Yovana GUTOWSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF PLACER, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ricotta v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
- Golden Gate Water Ski Club v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Clemes v. Del Norte County Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.