Legal Opinion

Studley v. National Fuel Gas Supply Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward M. Horey, J.

The contentions between the plaintiff and defendant concern a certain sight draft delivered by defendant’s predecessor in interest to the plaintiff. The sight draft in issue was dated November 30,1973 and was in the sum of $476. The moneys recited in the sight draft were not payments due under the provisions of the two oil and gas leases which were executed simultaneously with the sight draft. While the amount of the draft was computed on the basis of the amount of acreage involved in the two oil and gas leases (totaling 476 acres), the payment was in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Fritsch v. RarbackNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Caspert v. Anderson Apartments, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ciufo v. CiufoNew York Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Studley v. National Fuel Gas Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Mendelsohn v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API