Legal Opinion
Fritsch v. Rarback
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 1950PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
Plaintiff, a member of a labor union, brings this ■ representative action to have declared as null and void a referendum conducted within the local unions comprising District Council No. 9 of the Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America. The referendum involves a proposed amendment of the by-laws of the district council and purported to extend the term of office of its secretary-treasurer from one to two years. Plaintiff claims that the referendum was illegal because it was not conducted by secret ballot as required by the Brotherhood Constitution. In addition to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Polin v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Calhoun v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Groesbeck v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Feldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Seligson v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lowe v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Schonfeld v. RafteryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Caliendo v. McFarlandNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re the Arbitration Between Willard Alexander, Inc. & GlasserNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ballas v. McKiernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.