Legal Opinion
Ciufo v. Ciufo
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nathan D. Lapham,
Official Referee. This is a motion for an additional allowance pursuant to the provisions of section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 200 of the Rules of Civil Practice. While there are two decisions in our (4th) Department which hold that an official referee was without power to order an extra allowance (Di Silvestro v. Sons of Italy Grand Lodge, 228 App. Div. 14; Wilson v. Moon, 240 App. Div. 440), the authority of the official referee was thereafter enlarged (Judiciary Law, §§ 115-125 as added by.L. 1935, ch. 854) to permit him to entertain such a motion (Ryerson &…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Smith v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Wilson v. MoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- DiTomasso v. LoverroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Morse v. Palatine InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Addamo v. ScaturroCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Southwestern Shipping Corp. v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Studley v. National Fuel Gas Supply Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.