Legal Opinion
Caspert v. Anderson Apartments, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Isidor Wasservogel,
Official Referee. This is an action to foreclose a mortgage affecting premises known as 102 West 80th Street, New York City. Plaintiffs claim that the defendant mortgagor has failed to comply with a provision in a mortgage extension agreement which required that all violations against the premises be complied with and removed within three months after they had been filed by the appropriate authorities. Defendants concede that certain violations were not cured within the time limit set forth in the mortgage extension agreement. They contend, however, that the plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kothe v. R. C. Taylor TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Mooney v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Noyes v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Trimm v. . MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Rockaway Park Series Corp. v. Hollis Automotive Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- W. F. M. Restaurant, Inc. v. AusternNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Syncsort, Inc. v. Indata ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.