Legal Opinion

Reagan v. Philadelphia Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1925No. 24,796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This action was brought on a life insurance policy, was tried by the court with a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs made the usual alternative motion for judgment or a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal followed.

The application for the policy, identified in the record as Exhibit A, was taken by Louis Finkelstein, an agent of the company, and contains the following recital over the signature of the insured:

“I have this 15th day of July given to Louis Finkelstein, Agent, the sum of nothing, to be used in payment of the first annual premium on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Coughlin v. Reliance Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Kollitz v. Equitable Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Union Central Life Insurance v. TaggartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Gardner v. United Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Masson v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Rogers v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  5. Zemler v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API