Legal Opinion

Zemler v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1929No. 27,240PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Defendant appeals from a judgment on a life insurance policy rendered after a denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The facts are practically undisputed, and the sole question is whether the policy ever went into effect.

Hilda Zemler, 22 years of age, resided with her parents on a farm and taught a near-by school. On October 10, 1927, she made an application for a policy payable to her mother, the plaintiff, and on the same date executed her promissory note, payable December 1, 1927, to E. J. Stewart, the soliciting agent of defendant, for the amount of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Olson v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Sawyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Reagan v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LaFavor v. American National Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Wanshura v. State Farm Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Rogers v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Lueck v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Rogers v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API