Legal Opinion
Coughlin v. Reliance Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 16, 1925No. 24,378PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiff has appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The complaint says that plaintiff is the mother of Joseph D. Coughlin and the beneficiary named in a policy, attached to the complaint, issued by defendant, upon his life. The policy was issued November 13, 1919, and insured paid the first year’s premium of $48.63 in advance. November 13, 1920, the second premium became due. At that time the insured paid to defendant in cash the sum of $12.63 and executed and delivered to defendant his note in the following form:
“Policy No. 164756.
“Minneapolis, Minn., November 13,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Phoenix Ins. Co. v. DosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Veal v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Amarillo Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Itasca Paper Co. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Wastun v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. of Ft. Wayne, Ind.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- State, by Head v. Aamco Automatic TransmissionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Sawyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.