Legal Opinion
American Wildlands v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2002No. Civ.A. 00-2521(EGS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This matter stems from a challenge brought by plaintiffs to a decision made by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) that listing the Westslope cutthroat trout (“WCT”) as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531, et seq., is not warranted at this time.
Pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ motions and the responses and replies thereto, the briefs filed by Amici Montana and Idaho, the administrative record in this case,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Wildlands v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Shays v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Oceana, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Center for Biological Diversity v. LohnDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2003
- Trout Unlimited v. LohnDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.