Legal Opinion
Trout Unlimited v. Lohn
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 13, 2007No. Civil Case 06-1493-STPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KING, District Judge:
The Honorable Janice Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on July 13, 2007. All parties filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct. 1277, 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982). The matter is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- In Re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act ListingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Western Watersheds Project v. Fish and Wildlife Serv.District Court, D. Idaho · 2007
- Conservation Council for Hawaii v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
- Western Watersheds Project v. AsheDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.