Legal Opinion

National Surety Corp. v. Kruse

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1948No. 8724PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Choate

National Surety Corporation, plaintiff below, brought action against defendants under sections 9835.1-9835.16, Revised Codes of Montana 1935. The purpose of the action was to procure a declaratory judgment as to plaintiff’s rights and obligations under a bond which it had executed as surety for M. L. Barr, a wholesale produce dealer, as such rights might be affected by a certain order of the commissioner of agriculture of the state of Montana (hereinafter designated as the commissioner), relating to a controversy between defendants M. L. Barr and T. B. Reagan over the purchase of apples.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Butte Electric Railway Co. v. MathewsMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Morse v. MorseMontana Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ryan v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Dew v. DowerMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Old Fashion Baptist Church v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Heller v. OsburnsenMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re the Custody of C.S.F.Montana Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API