Legal Opinion

Dew v. Dower

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1993No. 92-327PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

The Dowers appeal from a judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, finding that they fraudulently induced plaintiffs Dew, Dresch and Posey to enter contracts for deed. We affirm liability, but reverse and remand to recalculate damages.

This case previously came before us after the District Court granted a directed verdict in favor of the Dowers. Dew v. Dower (1989), 237 Mont. 476, 774 P.2d 989 (Dew I). In Dew I, we ruled that a jury question existed as to whether the Dowers fraudulently induced the plaintiffs into entering contracts for deed. Dew, 774 P.2d at 991.

Following…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Thayer v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Redke v. SilvertrustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Silvers v. SilversAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Barnes v. City of Thompson FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Semenza v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API