In re Feazel

■ liPER CURIAM. *

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from formal charges filed by the Office *970of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Barry G. Feazel, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana. The charges allege respondent violated Rules 1.3 (lack of due diligence), 1.4 (failing to comply with reasonable requests for information), 1.15(b) (failing to return and account for client funds), 8.1(b) (knowing failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), 8.1(c) (failing to cooperate with the disciplinary…