Legal Opinion

In re Feazel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 2004No. 2004-B-0859Published

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected his client’s legal matter, failed to communicate with his client, and failed to refund an unearned legal fee. This misconduct occurred in the same time frame as the misconduct forming the basis of respondent’s earlier disciplinary matters. Prior to the filing of new formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re FeazelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  2. In re FeazelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API