Legal Opinion

In re Decker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 22, 2001No. 2001-B-0968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

hPER CURIAM.*

This disciplinary matter arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against *618respondent, William E. Decker, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

On August 12, 1998, the heirs of Anna Mae Caraway paid respondent $525 to handle her succession. The succession .was not complicated or unusual; respondent was simply required to put the heirs in possession of Mrs. Caraway’s estate.

For eight months, respondent’s clients repeatedly contacted him requesting information on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In re HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. In Re KendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. In Re BivinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ArbourSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. In re BlansonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. In re DeckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API