In re Williams
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
JiPER CURIAM. *
This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from two counts of formal charges *212instituted by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Carl V. Williams, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana, alleging violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(f) and 8.4(a)(c) and (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 28.
As to the first count, the record indicates respondent was terminated from his employment with the Legal Aid Bureau (“Legal Aid”)1 based on his failure to pursue a number of client complaints. When…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re PhelpsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- In re DeckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- In re FeazelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- In Re WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011