Legal Opinion

In re Feazel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 9, 2001No. 2001-B-2309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*772ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

JjPER CURIAM.*

This disciplinary matter arises from six counts of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Barry G. Feazel. This court previously suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. In re Feazel, 98-2060 (La.10/9/98), 718 So.2d 969 (“Feazel I”).1 Although more than two years have passed since respondent was eligible to apply for reinstatement from the suspension imposed in Feazel I, he has not sought reinstatement and therefore remains suspended.

UNDERLYING FACTS

The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In re PowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. In Re BivinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. In re FeazelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. In re FeazelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API