Legal Opinion

Harris v. Carter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2008No. 06-35313PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Jerry Harris (“Harris”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing Harris’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus as time-barred and concluding that Harris is not entitled to equitable tolling. Harris argues that he is entitled to equitable tolling because he relied on our precedent. We were subsequently overruled by the Supreme Court in a decision that holds that untimely state habeas corpus petitions do not toll the federal statute of limitations for filing a federal petition. Harris’ federal habeas petition, which would have been timely under our…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Pliler v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Roberts v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Bills v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Porter v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Waldron-Ramsey v. PacholkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API