Legal Opinion
Porter v. Ollison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 2010No. 07-55305PublishedCited by 250 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant’s petition for rehearing is granted in part and denied in part.
The opinion dated July 29, 2010 is hereby amended as follows:
1. On page 10888, fn5, line 3 change < California Supreme habeas > to < California Supreme Court habeas >.
2. On page 10891, line 4 from bottom, change <When the California Supreme Court denies a habeas petition, that round of habeas review is> to <RO, 2003, when the California Supreme Court denied a habeas petition, that round of habeas review was >.
3. On page 10891, last line change to <819; Cal. R. of Ct. 8.532(b)(2)(C) (2003). >
4. On page 10894, replace…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Pliler v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by250 opinions
- Lee v. LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rolando Gus Paez v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Trigueros v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Omar Gomaa Orabi v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Destinni Mardesich v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.