Legal Opinion
Mason & Dixon Intermodal v. Lapmaster International LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2011No. 09-17833PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Mason and Dixon Intermodal, Inc. (MDII), a motor carrier, appeals the district court’s judgment in its diversity action regarding damage to goods in interstate carriage against Lapmaster, a shipper; Lapmaster’s insurer, Hartford; and a freight broker, ITG Transportation, Inc. Lapmaster and Hartford brought claims for the value of the damage to the freight against MDII under the Carmack Amendment, and California law negligence claims against ITG; and MDII maintained state law negligence and contribution claims against ITG. ITG entered into a settlement agreement…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Ruiz v. FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- Derosa v. Association of Apartment Owners of the Golf VillasDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2016
- Great American Assurance Co. v. Discover Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2011
- Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Miller v. Monroe School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.