Legal Opinion
Lesnik v. Eisenmann SE
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 20, 2019No. Case No. 16-CV-01120-LHKPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 300
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge *933Plaintiffs Gregor Lesnik and Stjepan Papes (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have brought suit stemming from their time working at a facility owned by Tesla, Inc. ("Tesla") in Fremont, California, against 36 different Defendants. Before the Court is an omnibus motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Eisenmann Corporation ("Eisenmann"), Tesla, Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. ("Mercedes-Benz"), Deere & Company ("Deere"), REHAU Inc. ("REHAU"), LaX Fabricating Ltd. ("LaX"),…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gregor Lesnik v. Ism Vuzem D.O.O.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Aliaga Aguero v. EsnozDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Anna Castaneda v. Debra’s Way Productions LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Billington v. HCL Technologies Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Davis v. MaherDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.