Legal Opinion

Browne v. Bayless

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 1, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 00-0546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

¶ 1 The appellants, Harry Browne, Mar-cene Candelaria and Peter Schmerl (collectively referred to as “Browne”), requested an affirmative injunction requiring the Arizona Secretary of State, Betsey Bayless (“Secretary of State”), to accept Browne’s late-filed petition to appear on the November 2000 Arizona ballot as an independent candidate for President of the United States. The trial court denied Browne’s injunction request and ruled in favor of the Secretary of State. Browne now appeals from the trial court’s ruling. He argues that the Arizona filing deadline for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Sandblom v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Browne v. BaylessArizona Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API