Legal Opinion
Browne v. Bayless
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2002No. CV-01-0383-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESCHER, Judge. *
¶ 1 On August 17, 2000, Betsey Bay-less, the Secretary of State, refused to accept Harry Browne’s designation of electors and nominating petitions to appear on the November ballot as an independent candidate for president of the United States because they were filed two months beyond the statutory deadline. Rejecting Browne’s 1 claim that the filing deadline for independent candidates in A.R.S. § 16-341 violated the First Amendment, the trial court denied his request for declaratory and injunctive relief. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the statute…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Campbell v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
- Browne v. BaylessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. DavidsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Matter of Brown v. Erie County Bd. of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Arizonans for Second Chances v. HobbsArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Browne v. Bayless, Secretary of State of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002