Legal Opinion
Galeb v. Cupertino Sanitary District
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1964No. Civ. 21010PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The Cupertino Sanitary District of Santa Clara County (hereafter referred to as district) appeals from a judgment holding that the respondents, B. T. Galeb and his wife (hereafter referred to as Galeb) had a proprietary interest in a community sewer system and awarding them compensation therefor. The appellant district contends that: (1) the streets were dedicated to public use; (2) the dedication of streets to public use includes the sewers underneath; and (3) Galeb was not entitled to any compensation.
Facts
A brief review of the events leading to this action is necessary for an understanding…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Levi v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Versailles Township Authority v. McKeesportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DiMartino v. CITY OF ORINDACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bello v. ABA Energy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ratchford v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Biagini v. BeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.