Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Osborn
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1941No. Civil No. 4403PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The petitioners instituted this proceeding by certiorari against the respondent, Governor of Arizona, for the purpose of testing 'the legality of their removal by him as members of the Industrial Commission of Arizona.
Petitioner Holmes was appointed to such office in March, 1933, by the then governor, Honorable B. B. Moeur, and at the expiration of such term was reappointed, for the term beginning January 8, 1940, by the then governor, Honorable R. T. Jones, with the advice of the senate, and was acting under this last appointment when the respondent ordered his removal therefrom.
Petitioner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Wehe v. FrazierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Studebaker Bros. v. MauWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Winsor v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- West v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Concini v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Hunt v. NortonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.