Legal Opinion
Concini v. Sullivan
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1948No. 5058PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an original action in quo warranto filed pursuant to article 6, section 4 of the State Constitution and section 28-301, A. C. A. 1939, in the name of the State of Arizona upon the relation of Evo De Concini claiming to be the Attorney General of the State against John L. Sullivan who is alleged to be usurping, intruding into, unlawfully holding, and pretending to exercise the office of Attorney General. A citation was issued by this court directed to respondent Sullivan to answer by what warrant he claimed to exercise the office of Attorney General.
The pleadings do not present any…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McKannay v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Fitts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- MacMillan Co. v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sheehan v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- May v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- People v. EnlowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- State v. LubetkinArizona Supreme Court · 1954
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.