Studebaker Bros. v. Mau
Wyoming Supreme Court
ON petition for rehearing. (in support of petition for rehearing). The cases cited by the learned author of Mechem on Sales, in support of the proposition that conditional sale contracts should be determined by the laws of the state or country where they are made, and if valid there will be enforced in any other state or country, although not filed or recorded in the.latter jurisdiction, are not distinguished in that work; several important points we think are overlooked in…
Read the full summary
ON petition for rehearing. (in support of petition for rehearing). The cases cited by the learned author of Mechem on Sales, in support of the proposition that conditional sale contracts should be determined by the laws of the state or country where they are made, and if valid there will be enforced in any other state or country, although not filed or recorded in the.latter jurisdiction, are not distinguished in that work; several important points we think are overlooked in the citation of such authorities. Most of them are to be distinguished from the case at bar and the points here…
1Opinion of the Court
Van Orsdel, Justice.
This case was decided at the last term of this court (80 Pac., 151). A petition for rehearing was filed within time and the cause was reargued and briefs submitted in support of the petition. For a statement of the case reference is made to the original opinion. The grounds assigned in the petition for rehearing, upon which it is claimed the court erred in its former decision, briefly summarized, are as follows That the doctrine of comity does not apply in this case, for the reason that the contract in question, being a conditional bill of sale and not recorded in Utah,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Denny v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Guillander v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- H. Rouw Co. v. Texas Citrus CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.