Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Hardin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 20, 1931No. 8160PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. An exception based upon the refusal of the court to award a nonsuit will not be considered, where, subsequently thereto, the case is submitted to the jury and, a verdict being rendered against the defendant, a motion for new trial is made which presents the complaint that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Where a motion for new trial is based upon this ground, the' court will review the sufficiency of the evidence as a whole, in the light of the verdict, and will not merely consider the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s case to withstand a motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MoteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Hardin v. RubinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Farmers Union Warehouse, Storage Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simmons Company v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Columbia Fire Insurance v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Firemen's Insurance v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Hicks v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API