Legal Opinion

Hicks v. City of Dublin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 1937No. 26083PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

The defendant was convicted, in recorder’s court of the City of Dublin, for violating the following ordinance: “That from and after the passing of this ordinance it shall be unlawful for any theatre or moving-picture show to operate any motion-picture machine or show or cause to be shown any moving picture on Sunday, . . except between the hours of one and two o’clock in the afternoon.” Under its charter the City of Dublin has power and authority “to license, regulate, and control all opera houses, theatres, and picture shows, . . places of amusement,” and to pass such ordinances “as to [the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Academy v. BohlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Campbell v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Power v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Callaway v. MimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Hood v. Von GlahnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API