Simmons Company v. Hardin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
1. Under the general grounds of his motion for new trial, the defendant contends that the verdict, as a matter of law, is contrary to the evidence presented at the trial and should not be allowed to stand.
In his brief and argument, the defendant (plaintiff in error) admits that the petition sets forth a cause of action and was not subject to general demurrer, but he insists that the verdict is contrary to the evidence as a matter of law. The plaintiff contends that this is a new assignment and can not be considered by this court, not having been raised in the court below. This contention is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Rotche v. Buick Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Dahms v. General Elevator Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Defore v. Bourjois, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- STOVALL & COMPANY, INC. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Moody v. Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.