Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Massey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1931No. Appeal, 305PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The basic question in this case is whether or not the bond in suit is one of guaranty or indemnity. The action is assumpsit on a completion bond; the lower court held it to be a guaranty, and the measure of damage thereon to be the cost of completion. These rulings were excepted to, and after judgment was entered on the verdict, they were assigned as error, and defendants appealed.

The facts are almost determinative of the issue, and are as follows: The plaintiff, Mrs. Elizabeth Purdy, sold to one Valentine Kulp, a straw man for Isaac Wood Massey, defendant, a piece…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Young v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. March v. AllaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Ruth-Hastings Glass Tube Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Weightman v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Equitable Trust Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Trainor Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Bill Curphy Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. Lebanon Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API