Enfield v. Stout
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
This matter involves two appeals in separate actions, arising out of an automobile accident, which were consolidated for the purpose of trial in the court below.
The first case presented in the lower court was that of the Stouts against Donald Lee Enfield. Plaintiffs put in their case. Defendant (the additional defendant, as such, has no interest in this appeal) moved for a compulsory nonsuit and, it being denied, rested without presenting any evidence. Thereupon, defendant moved for a directed verdict. It, too, was denied. Whereupon, the taMng of testimony in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kindt v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Risbon v. CottomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Ferruzza v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Rowles v. EvanuikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. JenningsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Zeman v. Canonsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.