Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Almeida

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1949No. Appeal, 78PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from a judgment of guilty of murder in the first degree, with the death penalty. The crime’s locale was Philadelphia; its victim, Cecil Ingling, a forty-two year old patrolman off duty. On January 30,1947, David Almeida, Edward Hough and James Smith imbibed freely of liquor at a Philadelphia taproom, and in another taproom at 22nd and Fitzwater Streets Smith gave a .45 automatic type revolver to Hough and “a large pistol” to Almeida. Hough had a smaller pistol. Carrying out a “hold-up” plan they then went to a garage, pointed their pistols…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. RedlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. BolishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Smith v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. BaldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API