Commonwealth v. Almeida
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from a judgment of guilty of murder in the first degree, with the death penalty. The crime’s locale was Philadelphia; its victim, Cecil Ingling, a forty-two year old patrolman off duty. On January 30,1947, David Almeida, Edward Hough and James Smith imbibed freely of liquor at a Philadelphia taproom, and in another taproom at 22nd and Fitzwater Streets Smith gave a .45 automatic type revolver to Hough and “a large pistol” to Almeida. Hough had a smaller pistol. Carrying out a “hold-up” plan they then went to a garage, pointed their pistols…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. RedlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. BolishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Smith v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. BaldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.