Legal Opinion

Payroll Advance, Inc. v. Yates

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2008No. SD 29040PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

Payroll Advance, Inc. (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered in favor of Barbara Yates (“Respondent”) on Appellant’s petition for in-junctive relief and breach of contract of an “Employment Agreement” (“the Employment Agreement”) which contains a cove nant not to compete. After a bench trial, the trial court found the Employment Agreement and its non-compete covenant signed by the parties was not valid in that it was “unreasonable under the facts and circumstances of the particular industry, agreement, and geographic location here involved.”…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. Robbins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Healthcare Services of the Ozarks, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Osage Glass, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. Continental Research Corp. v. ScholzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whelan Security Co. v. KennebrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Cigna Corporation v. Amy BrickerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  3. Kathryn Jimenez, Petitioner/Respondent v. Cintas CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Darr v. Roberts Marketing Group, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Greenstreet v. FairchildMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API