Legal Opinion

Continental Research Corp. v. Scholz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1980No. 41484PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant-employer Continental Research Corporation has appealed from its unsuccessful injunction and damages action, to enforce a non-compete covenant against defendant-respondent-employee Allen G. Scholz. The trial court limited the application of the non-compete restrictive covenant of the employment contract to the territory which had been assigned to the employee. The time frame for application of the restrictive covenant was restricted to an 18-month period subsequent to the termination of employment, which, in this case, had passed prior to the trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Prentice v. RoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. National Starch and Chemical Corp. v. NewmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Renwood Food Products, Inc. v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Western Blue Print Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Synergetics, Inc. v. Charles Richard Hurst, Jr. Michael McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Morrow v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Cambridge Engineering, Inc. v. Mercury Partners 90 BI, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Healthcare Services of the Ozarks, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API