In Re the Discipline of Dorothy

[¶ 59.] Dorothy has represented himself all through these proceedings. Along the way, this case has generated a blizzard of paper. In Dorothy’s final response he argues that the referee’s decision-making process was flawed. This was, he claims, caused by “two well-established, unconscious, psychological mechanisms of decision making, known as ‘selective perception’ and ‘cognitive dissonance.’ ”19

*512[¶ 60.] Further, Dorothy argues that if he has two attorneys testify that in their opinion there was no conduct by Dorothy which violated any provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, the court…