Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Rensch

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1983No. 13739PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

Respondent, William M. Rensch, was admitted to practice law in this State on May 31, 1950. He has gained a reputation of successfully defending people charged with crimes. Charles M. Huth was charged with murder. At his preliminary arraignment a magistrate determined that he was indigent and the Pennington County Public Defender’s Office was appointed to represent him. Mr. Huth was bound over to circuit court for trial, scheduled to begin January 5, 1981, before Judge Grosshans.

Prior to the date of trial, Mr. Huth contacted several private attorneys,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Matter of Discipline of TheodosenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re GoodrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re SchmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hedges v. HedgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of StrangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of Discipline of DanaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Matter of Discipline of HoppSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re the Discipline of WillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API