Matter of Discipline of Schmidt
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
Respondent, Harlan A. Schmidt (Schmidt), was admitted to practice law in this state on May 15, 1977. He subsequently established his practice of law in the Spearfish area.
The facts in this case are undisputed. On March 22, 1989, Schmidt prepared an affidavit under SDCL 16-18-2, to secure an Order admitting Douglas E. Schmidt, his brother and a nonresident attorney, the right to participate in a trial. Schmidt and his brother were to associate in a trial in South Dakota. In preparing the affidavit, Schmidt omitted the requirement in SDCL 16-18-2(4), providing that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Matter of Discipline of DanaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of Discipline of HoppSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of Discipline of RenschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re the Discipline of WillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Reaser v. ReaserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Discipline of ClaggettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Discipline of WilkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of Discipline of MinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re the Discipline of BihlmeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.