Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Lacey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1979No. 12249PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.

This is a disciplinary action brought against Charles Lacey (respondent) based upon a complaint filed by the Grievance-Committee (now the Disciplinary Board) of the State Bar. The Honorable Pat McKeever, one of the judges of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, was appointed to sit as a referee in the matter. The complaint charged respondent with three separate instances of unprofessional conduct. The referee found, however, that two of these charges had not been established by the evidence. We accept the referee’s finding with respect to these two charges and consequently will…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re HindsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. MichaelisNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API