Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Theodosen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1981No. 13028PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.

These proceedings were instituted by a complaint alleging that respondent-attorney John M. Theodosen of Garretson, South Dakota, violated SDCL 16-19-33(5), which provides that the willful violation of any bylaw, rule, or regulation duly adopted by the South Dakota State Bar Association and approved by the Supreme Court shall constitute misconduct and be grounds for discipline. The pertinent rules were adopted by the Bar Association and approved by the Supreme Court as SDCL 16-18 Appx. Canon 5, EC 5-5, and EC 5-6. . - . -\-

EC 5-5 reads:

A lawyer should not suggest to his client…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re GoodrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ekern v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Nelson v. First Northwestern Trust Co. of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re SchmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. In Re of Disbarment of JaquithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of StrangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of Discipline of StantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matter of Discipline of DanaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Matter of SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Matter of Discipline of HoppSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API