Legal Opinion

Lazenby v. Godwin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1979No. 7814SC358PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for directed verdict on the issue of constructive fraud. Defendant contends that a recovery for constructive fraud is predicated on a breach of a fiduciary duty, 6 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d, Fraud, § 7, and that under North Carolina law, a manager and director of a corporation does not stand in a fiduciary relationship to shareholders in regard to the acquisition of the shareholders’ stock. Therefore, defendant contends, he had no duty to disclose any information relating to the value of the stock or to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Boulden v. StilwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Kaplan v. O.K. Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. In re Wayport, Inc. LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  4. Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. Stone v. McClamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API