Legal Opinion

Vail v. Vail

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1951No. 675PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Tbe evidence in this ease tends to show these determinative factors: (1) that the defendant, Victor B. Vail, the grantee in the deed, stood in a confidential or fiduciary relation with the grantor, Mrs. Minnie P. Vail; and (2) that she retained possession and control of the lands embraced in the deed during the remainder of her life. These crucial circumstances being made to appear, along with the rest of the evidence offered below, made out a prima facie case entitling the plaintiffs to go to the jury on both the issue of fraud and that of the statute of limitations.

The issue of fraud: Fraud…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API