Frances Hankins v. The Gap, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Frances Hankins appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in this action under Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117. Hankins argues that her former employer, The Gap, Inc., discriminated against her on the basis of her migraine headaches. The district court, however, determined that she was not a “qualified individual with a disability.” We affirm, because Hankins failed to take advantage of reasonable accommodations provided by The Gap. In addition, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Han-kins’s pendent state…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ronald A. Landefeld v. Marion General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Ansonia Board of Education v. PhilbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. First of America Bank-WayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by180 opinions
- John Duda v. Board of Education of Franklin Park Public School District No. 84, John Barry, Dan PietriniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Moon v. Harrison Piping SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Joanne Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care System and Forum HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hannah P. v. Daniel CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.