Henley v. . Holt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
"WiNBORNE, J.
The principal question raised on tbis appeal is whether tbe plaintiff was prejudiced on tbe trial below by tbe exclusion of proper evidence for tbe consideration of tbe jury on tbe determinative issue. We think so.
Plaintiff seeks to establish a parol trust, alleging that be and defendant Floyd Holt entered into a trust agreement after tbe foreclosure sale, whereby tbe land was to be purchased by Holt for tbe benefit of the plaintiff. Considerable evidence offered by plaintiff tending to show negotiations and agreements with Holt concerning tbe purchase of tbe land, prior to tbe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Speas Ex Rel. Shugart v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- America Potato Co. v. Jeanette Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Bank of Union v. StackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Ollis v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Durant v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Doub v. HauserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- McCorkle v. . BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Farmers Federation, Inc. v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Potato Co. v. . JeannetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.