Legal Opinion

Potato Co. v. . Jeannette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was brought to recover $469.40 as damages for refusing to receive a certain lot of potatoes which, it is alleged, the defendants contracted to buy. The case was here before, and is reported in 172 N.C. at p. 1. The defendants, who failed in the former appeal, have amended their original answer and asked (238) for a reformation of the contract, dated 25 October 1912, which provided that plaintiffs should ship under it, and deliver to the defendants at Elizabeth City, 800 sacks of Cobblers and 200 sacks of White Bliss potatoes, at prices named, they "to be of the best quality shipped…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Jackson v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Clark v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Robinson v. Willoughby.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Murphy v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Rourk v. Brunswick CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Craft v. . Timber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API