Speas Ex Rel. Shugart v. City of Greensboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The record is voluminous but the controversy involves only a few familiar principles of law. A brief consideration of the exceptions is all that is necessary.
Neither defendant is entitled to a judgment of nonsuit. The motion of the corporate defendant rests upon three propositions: (1) The evidence of negligence against the city is not sufficient to justify the submission of an issue to the jury; (2) the plaintiff’s injury was due to the independent and intervening acts of the defendant Wall; (3) according to his own evidence the negligence of the plaintiff proximately contributed to his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Williams v. Frederickson Motor Express Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Davis v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Dillon v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Ferguson Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.