Legal Opinion

Speas Ex Rel. Shugart v. City of Greensboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 22, 1933PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The record is voluminous but the controversy involves only a few familiar principles of law. A brief consideration of the exceptions is all that is necessary.

Neither defendant is entitled to a judgment of nonsuit. The motion of the corporate defendant rests upon three propositions: (1) The evidence of negligence against the city is not sufficient to justify the submission of an issue to the jury; (2) the plaintiff’s injury was due to the independent and intervening acts of the defendant Wall; (3) according to his own evidence the negligence of the plaintiff proximately contributed to his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Williams v. Frederickson Motor Express Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Davis v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Dillon v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Ferguson Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API