Legal Opinion
State v. Chipman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 10, 2013No. 43668-0-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaxa, J.
¶1 Kody Michael Chipman appeals a restitution order entered after the 180-day deadline the legislature established in RCW 9.94A.753G). The State argues that the order is valid because it modifies a timely resti*617tution order regarding another victim. We disagree and reverse.1
FACTS
¶2 On March 31, 2011, Chipman recklessly drove a vehicle that struck two men on foot: Dee Cooper and Daniel Kitchings. Both men sustained serious injuries. The State charged Chipman with three crimes: count I for vehicular assault against Cooper, count II for vehicular assault against Kitchings, and count III for hit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Elyas KerowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Jonathan Charles WyattCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Robert FordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State of Washington v. Joseph Theodore JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.