State Of Washington v. Elyas Kerow
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Verellen, A.C.J.
¶1 RCW 9.94A.753(1) requires that restitution be determined within 180 days of sentencing. In this vehicle prowl conviction, the amount of damage to the car causally related to that crime was undisputed. The court continued the restitution hearing to gather more information on the relationship between the car’s owner and the insured policyholder. Because Kerow “voluntarily accommodated the State’s request” to continue the restitution hearing beyond the statutory deadline but “he was not obliged to do so,” we conclude Kerow waived the statutory requirements of RCW Q.QdA.TSSU).
¶2…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MollichiWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. DeskinsWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. GranthamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Jennifer A. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- State Of Washington v. Douglas Allen SaarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington v. Genevieve Gabriela KorvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Jennifer A. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- State of Washington v. Joseph Theodore JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.