Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2010No. 81525-9PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 Robert Bustmante Gonzalez seeks to reverse an order modifying the total amount of his restitution. He argues that the State violated RCW 9.94A.753, the restitution statute, when it sought to modify his restitution order more than two years after the order was originally entered. He also argues that imposing additional restitution constituted a second punishment in violation of double jeopardy. We reject both of Gonzalez’s arguments and affirm the order of the trial court.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 On March 23, 2003, Gonzalez struck Denny Thoren in the face and robbed him of his…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. SweanyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. GrayWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API