Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Beisel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1960No. 37,748PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Action brought by Edward P. Flynn and Loretta H. Flynn to enjoin Walter E. Beisel, Clifford S. Heitke, Elaine A. Heitke, and the township of Paynesville from erecting and maintaining a dock at the termination of a public easement abutting on Lake Koronis, a navigable body of water situated in Stearns County, Minnesota.

Plaintiffs admit that the public has easement rights of ingress to and egress from Lake Koronis but allege that those rights arise by prescription and not by dedication or grant and are restricted to travel only and not to use of navigable waters extending beyond…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Godfrey v. City of AltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Potomac Steamboat Co. v. Upper Potomac Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Backus v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bach v. SarichWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ace Equipment Sales, Inc. v. BuccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Gibson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C & C Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Barth v. StenwickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API